The 'SHANTI' Bill Is A Radioactive Gamble With India's Future
The Bill shields foreign suppliers from being sued. It blocks citizens from the courts. It looks like a law written by the nuclear lobby, for the nuclear lobby.
In the halls of Parliament, we are used to debating laws that are dry, technical, and frankly, often boring. But every now and then, a piece of paper lands in our inboxes that threatens to change the basic compact between the government and the people. The new Atomic Energy (Amendment) Bill, 2025 - which has been ironically named the "Shanti Bill" - is exactly such a moment. On the surface, it claims to be about bringing power to our homes and development to our nation. But if you strip away the fancy words and look at the fine print, you will find a law that is great at splitting atoms but can only be defended by splitting hairs. It is a law that threatens to hand over massive profits to private companies while leaving the ordinary Indian citizen to pay the price for any disaster.
This Bill, bulldozed through Parliament despite the reasoned objections of MPs, takes us from a past of careful responsibility to a future of reckless gambling. Instead of giving us clarity, the government has given us confusion. Instead of strong safety rules, they have given us loopholes big enough to drive a truck through. We are forced to ask a simple question: Is this truly a Nuclear Bill, or is it merely an Unclear Bill?
A Free-For-All
The most alarming change in this bill is how it throws the doors wide open to private players to come in and set up nuclear facilities. This is not a carefully measured step; it is a free-for-all. The bill allows a single private company to hold a license for everything: digging up the uranium, making the fuel, running the reactor, and even handling the dangerous waste. When one private company controls every single step of the chain, the danger multiplies. When the main goal is to make money for shareholders, safety checks stop being essential rules and start looking like expensive inconveniences. We are handing over the keys to our most dangerous technology to people whose primary interest is their bank balance, not our safety.
Perhaps the most unfair part of this bill is the "liability cap". This is the maximum amount of money a company has to pay if their reactor blows up or leaks radiation. The bill sets this cap at 300 million Special Drawing Rights - which is roughly ₹3,900 crores or $460 million. To the average person, that sounds like a lot of money. But in the world of nuclear disasters, it is pocket change. Look at the tragedy of Fukushima in Japan. The cleanup costs there have already crossed $182 billion. That is hundreds of times more than the cap this bill proposes. The Chernobyl disaster cost over $700 billion.
Who Pays For It? The Citizens
So, here is the terrifying question: If a private operator causes a disaster that costs $100 billion, but they only have to pay $460 million, who pays the difference? The answer is simple: You do. The taxpayer pays. The government pays. This creates what economists call a "moral hazard". We are telling private corporations: "You keep the profits when things go well, but the Indian public will pay the bill when things go wrong." We are effectively subsidising their risk. They get the reward; we get the danger. This is not capitalism; it is cronyism dressed up as energy policy.
The cruelty of this bill is not just financial; it is human. The legislation sets a strict time limit for victims to claim compensation: you have only 10 years to claim for property damage and 20 years for personal injury. This provision shows a shocking ignorance of science. Radiation does not work like a car accident, where you get hurt immediately. It is a silent killer. Cancers caused by radiation can take decades to appear. A child exposed to a leak today might develop leukaemia when she is 30 years old. Under this "Shanti Bill", the victim would have no right to ask for help. They would be told, "Sorry, your time is up."
A Closed, Dangerous Loop
Furthermore, the bill blocks citizens from going to regular civil courts. If you are hurt, you cannot go to a judge. You have to go to a special authority appointed by the government. And who decides if there was negligence? The government-controlled bodies. It creates a closed loop where the regulator, the operator, and the judge are all on the same team, leaving the victim standing outside, helpless. It is a system designed to limit the payout for companies, not to deliver justice to Indians.
In any game, the referee must be fair and independent. In the nuclear industry, our referee is the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB). A strong law would make the AERB completely independent, answering only to Parliament or the Constitution. But the Shanti Bill leaves the AERB under the thumb of the central government. The same government that wants to build more plants and make deals with foreign companies is also in charge of safety. There is no separation.
Even worse, the Bill grants the government the power to exempt any nuclear plant from the rules if they decide the risk is "insignificant". But the bill does not define what "insignificant" means. It is left entirely to the government. This is a backdoor that allows them to bypass the very safety laws they claim to be passing. It creates a "License Raj" of exemptions, where rules apply to some but not to others.
A Regressive Step
Finally, is this even financially smart? Nuclear power is incredibly expensive and takes years to build. We are talking about pouring trillions of rupees - estimates suggest ₹19.3 trillion - into a technology that may soon be obsolete. The cost of solar and wind energy is crashing down. Battery technology is getting better every day. Why are we locking ourselves into expensive, dangerous technology from the past when safer, cheaper, and faster alternatives are available? By obsessing over nuclear energy, we are starving the renewable sector of the money it needs. Are we buying a dinosaur when we could be buying the future?
The "Shanti Bill" also strips workers of their rights under labour laws. It shields foreign suppliers from being sued. It blocks citizens from the courts. It looks like a law written by the nuclear lobby, for the nuclear lobby. If this bill passes in its current form, the name will be a cruel joke in the aftermath of a preventable tragedy. The cost of this bill's promises is hidden in the fine print, but if we are not careful, it is a price that will be paid by our children.
(Shashi Tharoor has been a Member of Parliament from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, since 2009. He is an author and a former diplomat.)
Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
-
Opinion | After Bondi Beach Attack, Some Hard Questions For The Muslim World
The Muslim ummah needs to confront the anger, denial and victimhood narratives that create the environment in which extremists begin to believe their violence is righteous.
-
Opinion | India's Aviation Model Is Cracking Under Its Own Weight
When airlines strain against duty hour limits, when safety oversight suffers from understaffing, when passenger protection exists only on paper, the aviation system functions dangerously, accumulating risks that eventually manifest as crises.
-
Blog | "It Was A Shell From My Tank": When A Father Met The Pak Soldier Who Killed His Son
"He stood like a rock before our Patton tanks," Brigadier Naser (retd) told Madan Lal Khetarpal, almost three decades after his son was killed in battle.
-
Opinion | Will Congress 'High Command' Fumble Another State? Possibly
Significantly, Karnataka is the fourth Congress-ruled state seeing such mayhem under Kharge.
-
Opinion | India's Exclusion From US' Pax Silica Club Isn't A Snub - But It Matters
India is not part of the initial grouping. Some see this as a snub. Others say it does not matter. Both reactions miss the point. The issue is not optics. It is whether India is moving fast enough up the chokepoint ladder to be treated as a partner rather than a customer.
-
Blog | Shivraj Patil: The 'Always Dapper' Home Minister, Brought Down By 26/11
A Sonia loyalist, Patil was known for his impeccable style and elegance. But nothing could prepare him for the aftershocks of the dastardly 26/11 terror attacks in Mumbai.
-
Opinion | The Miami 'Purge': India Must Decide Its Seat As Trump 'Restructures' The G20
The restructuring of G20 reflects Trump's transactional worldview and his administration's impatience with multilateral forums that require consensus-building with developing economies.
-
Luthra Brothers To Be Deported: How Is It Different From Extradition?
India has suspended 'Birch by Romeo Lane' owners Gaurav Luthra and Saurabh Luthra's passports, meaning they cannot leave Thailand even if they were free to do so.