The 'SHANTI' Bill Is A Radioactive Gamble With India's Future
The Bill shields foreign suppliers from being sued. It blocks citizens from the courts. It looks like a law written by the nuclear lobby, for the nuclear lobby.
In the halls of Parliament, we are used to debating laws that are dry, technical, and frankly, often boring. But every now and then, a piece of paper lands in our inboxes that threatens to change the basic compact between the government and the people. The new Atomic Energy (Amendment) Bill, 2025 - which has been ironically named the "Shanti Bill" - is exactly such a moment. On the surface, it claims to be about bringing power to our homes and development to our nation. But if you strip away the fancy words and look at the fine print, you will find a law that is great at splitting atoms but can only be defended by splitting hairs. It is a law that threatens to hand over massive profits to private companies while leaving the ordinary Indian citizen to pay the price for any disaster.
This Bill, bulldozed through Parliament despite the reasoned objections of MPs, takes us from a past of careful responsibility to a future of reckless gambling. Instead of giving us clarity, the government has given us confusion. Instead of strong safety rules, they have given us loopholes big enough to drive a truck through. We are forced to ask a simple question: Is this truly a Nuclear Bill, or is it merely an Unclear Bill?
A Free-For-All
The most alarming change in this bill is how it throws the doors wide open to private players to come in and set up nuclear facilities. This is not a carefully measured step; it is a free-for-all. The bill allows a single private company to hold a license for everything: digging up the uranium, making the fuel, running the reactor, and even handling the dangerous waste. When one private company controls every single step of the chain, the danger multiplies. When the main goal is to make money for shareholders, safety checks stop being essential rules and start looking like expensive inconveniences. We are handing over the keys to our most dangerous technology to people whose primary interest is their bank balance, not our safety.
Perhaps the most unfair part of this bill is the "liability cap". This is the maximum amount of money a company has to pay if their reactor blows up or leaks radiation. The bill sets this cap at 300 million Special Drawing Rights - which is roughly ₹3,900 crores or $460 million. To the average person, that sounds like a lot of money. But in the world of nuclear disasters, it is pocket change. Look at the tragedy of Fukushima in Japan. The cleanup costs there have already crossed $182 billion. That is hundreds of times more than the cap this bill proposes. The Chernobyl disaster cost over $700 billion.
Who Pays For It? The Citizens
So, here is the terrifying question: If a private operator causes a disaster that costs $100 billion, but they only have to pay $460 million, who pays the difference? The answer is simple: You do. The taxpayer pays. The government pays. This creates what economists call a "moral hazard". We are telling private corporations: "You keep the profits when things go well, but the Indian public will pay the bill when things go wrong." We are effectively subsidising their risk. They get the reward; we get the danger. This is not capitalism; it is cronyism dressed up as energy policy.
The cruelty of this bill is not just financial; it is human. The legislation sets a strict time limit for victims to claim compensation: you have only 10 years to claim for property damage and 20 years for personal injury. This provision shows a shocking ignorance of science. Radiation does not work like a car accident, where you get hurt immediately. It is a silent killer. Cancers caused by radiation can take decades to appear. A child exposed to a leak today might develop leukaemia when she is 30 years old. Under this "Shanti Bill", the victim would have no right to ask for help. They would be told, "Sorry, your time is up."
A Closed, Dangerous Loop
Furthermore, the bill blocks citizens from going to regular civil courts. If you are hurt, you cannot go to a judge. You have to go to a special authority appointed by the government. And who decides if there was negligence? The government-controlled bodies. It creates a closed loop where the regulator, the operator, and the judge are all on the same team, leaving the victim standing outside, helpless. It is a system designed to limit the payout for companies, not to deliver justice to Indians.
In any game, the referee must be fair and independent. In the nuclear industry, our referee is the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB). A strong law would make the AERB completely independent, answering only to Parliament or the Constitution. But the Shanti Bill leaves the AERB under the thumb of the central government. The same government that wants to build more plants and make deals with foreign companies is also in charge of safety. There is no separation.
Even worse, the Bill grants the government the power to exempt any nuclear plant from the rules if they decide the risk is "insignificant". But the bill does not define what "insignificant" means. It is left entirely to the government. This is a backdoor that allows them to bypass the very safety laws they claim to be passing. It creates a "License Raj" of exemptions, where rules apply to some but not to others.
A Regressive Step
Finally, is this even financially smart? Nuclear power is incredibly expensive and takes years to build. We are talking about pouring trillions of rupees - estimates suggest ₹19.3 trillion - into a technology that may soon be obsolete. The cost of solar and wind energy is crashing down. Battery technology is getting better every day. Why are we locking ourselves into expensive, dangerous technology from the past when safer, cheaper, and faster alternatives are available? By obsessing over nuclear energy, we are starving the renewable sector of the money it needs. Are we buying a dinosaur when we could be buying the future?
The "Shanti Bill" also strips workers of their rights under labour laws. It shields foreign suppliers from being sued. It blocks citizens from the courts. It looks like a law written by the nuclear lobby, for the nuclear lobby. If this bill passes in its current form, the name will be a cruel joke in the aftermath of a preventable tragedy. The cost of this bill's promises is hidden in the fine print, but if we are not careful, it is a price that will be paid by our children.
(Shashi Tharoor has been a Member of Parliament from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, since 2009. He is an author and a former diplomat.)
Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
-
Gyanesh Kumar Has An Immunity Pin. Why A Petition Says He Can't Use It
The Opposition wants the Chief Election Commissioner prosecuted for alleged manipulation of voter rolls, but a 2023 law stands in the way. A petition in the Supreme Court now says the law has a gap.
-
Opinion | Is The World Staring At A Big Stock Market Crash - And Recession? 5 Uneasy Signs
On Wednesday, the US bond market recorded its worst day since Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs rattled markets in April 2025. The 30-year US Treasury yield topped 5.43%, putting it on track for its highest close since 2004.
-
Form 6 For New Voters: When A Small Change Triggered A Big Row
In July 2026, the online version of Form 6 on the ECI's ECINet portal was modified to include a new declaration.
-
Opinion | Saudi Arabia's China Turn Has Begun - After Learning Much The Hard Way
Leaning on China just makes sense for the Saudis right now. The question is, can its other great 'ally' stomach it?
-
Opinion | Bihar Assault, Hisar Marriage Ban: Who'll Stop The Guardians Of Indian 'Culture'?
Why exactly does the sight of a young couple seeking a bit of alone time somewhere tend to particularly provoke a certain kind of Indian men?
-
Opinion | The Trump-Xi Summit, And India's Many Worries Of Its Own
Washington and Beijing may have chosen coexistence over confrontation. For India, that could be both a relief and a warning.
-
Opinion | China Claims It Has Cut Troops At The Indian Border. But The Math Doesn't Add Up
The reduction likely has more to do with the deployment along the LAC than the total strength active in the region
-
Opinion | China Is No Longer Waiting For Trump To Set The Rules. And He Knows It
America's old diplomatic tricks with China won't work any longer. Because China has changed, and so has its ambitions.
-
Opinion | As UN Interviews Its Next Chief, The Interviewers Have Some Explaining To Do
On the panel sit governments whose wars, vetoes, and unpaid dues have helped make the organisation ineffective.