The 'SHANTI' Bill Is A Radioactive Gamble With India's Future
The Bill shields foreign suppliers from being sued. It blocks citizens from the courts. It looks like a law written by the nuclear lobby, for the nuclear lobby.
In the halls of Parliament, we are used to debating laws that are dry, technical, and frankly, often boring. But every now and then, a piece of paper lands in our inboxes that threatens to change the basic compact between the government and the people. The new Atomic Energy (Amendment) Bill, 2025 - which has been ironically named the "Shanti Bill" - is exactly such a moment. On the surface, it claims to be about bringing power to our homes and development to our nation. But if you strip away the fancy words and look at the fine print, you will find a law that is great at splitting atoms but can only be defended by splitting hairs. It is a law that threatens to hand over massive profits to private companies while leaving the ordinary Indian citizen to pay the price for any disaster.
This Bill, bulldozed through Parliament despite the reasoned objections of MPs, takes us from a past of careful responsibility to a future of reckless gambling. Instead of giving us clarity, the government has given us confusion. Instead of strong safety rules, they have given us loopholes big enough to drive a truck through. We are forced to ask a simple question: Is this truly a Nuclear Bill, or is it merely an Unclear Bill?
A Free-For-All
The most alarming change in this bill is how it throws the doors wide open to private players to come in and set up nuclear facilities. This is not a carefully measured step; it is a free-for-all. The bill allows a single private company to hold a license for everything: digging up the uranium, making the fuel, running the reactor, and even handling the dangerous waste. When one private company controls every single step of the chain, the danger multiplies. When the main goal is to make money for shareholders, safety checks stop being essential rules and start looking like expensive inconveniences. We are handing over the keys to our most dangerous technology to people whose primary interest is their bank balance, not our safety.
Perhaps the most unfair part of this bill is the "liability cap". This is the maximum amount of money a company has to pay if their reactor blows up or leaks radiation. The bill sets this cap at 300 million Special Drawing Rights - which is roughly ₹3,900 crores or $460 million. To the average person, that sounds like a lot of money. But in the world of nuclear disasters, it is pocket change. Look at the tragedy of Fukushima in Japan. The cleanup costs there have already crossed $182 billion. That is hundreds of times more than the cap this bill proposes. The Chernobyl disaster cost over $700 billion.
Who Pays For It? The Citizens
So, here is the terrifying question: If a private operator causes a disaster that costs $100 billion, but they only have to pay $460 million, who pays the difference? The answer is simple: You do. The taxpayer pays. The government pays. This creates what economists call a "moral hazard". We are telling private corporations: "You keep the profits when things go well, but the Indian public will pay the bill when things go wrong." We are effectively subsidising their risk. They get the reward; we get the danger. This is not capitalism; it is cronyism dressed up as energy policy.
The cruelty of this bill is not just financial; it is human. The legislation sets a strict time limit for victims to claim compensation: you have only 10 years to claim for property damage and 20 years for personal injury. This provision shows a shocking ignorance of science. Radiation does not work like a car accident, where you get hurt immediately. It is a silent killer. Cancers caused by radiation can take decades to appear. A child exposed to a leak today might develop leukaemia when she is 30 years old. Under this "Shanti Bill", the victim would have no right to ask for help. They would be told, "Sorry, your time is up."
A Closed, Dangerous Loop
Furthermore, the bill blocks citizens from going to regular civil courts. If you are hurt, you cannot go to a judge. You have to go to a special authority appointed by the government. And who decides if there was negligence? The government-controlled bodies. It creates a closed loop where the regulator, the operator, and the judge are all on the same team, leaving the victim standing outside, helpless. It is a system designed to limit the payout for companies, not to deliver justice to Indians.
In any game, the referee must be fair and independent. In the nuclear industry, our referee is the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB). A strong law would make the AERB completely independent, answering only to Parliament or the Constitution. But the Shanti Bill leaves the AERB under the thumb of the central government. The same government that wants to build more plants and make deals with foreign companies is also in charge of safety. There is no separation.
Even worse, the Bill grants the government the power to exempt any nuclear plant from the rules if they decide the risk is "insignificant". But the bill does not define what "insignificant" means. It is left entirely to the government. This is a backdoor that allows them to bypass the very safety laws they claim to be passing. It creates a "License Raj" of exemptions, where rules apply to some but not to others.
A Regressive Step
Finally, is this even financially smart? Nuclear power is incredibly expensive and takes years to build. We are talking about pouring trillions of rupees - estimates suggest ₹19.3 trillion - into a technology that may soon be obsolete. The cost of solar and wind energy is crashing down. Battery technology is getting better every day. Why are we locking ourselves into expensive, dangerous technology from the past when safer, cheaper, and faster alternatives are available? By obsessing over nuclear energy, we are starving the renewable sector of the money it needs. Are we buying a dinosaur when we could be buying the future?
The "Shanti Bill" also strips workers of their rights under labour laws. It shields foreign suppliers from being sued. It blocks citizens from the courts. It looks like a law written by the nuclear lobby, for the nuclear lobby. If this bill passes in its current form, the name will be a cruel joke in the aftermath of a preventable tragedy. The cost of this bill's promises is hidden in the fine print, but if we are not careful, it is a price that will be paid by our children.
(Shashi Tharoor has been a Member of Parliament from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, since 2009. He is an author and a former diplomat.)
Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
-
Opinion | Pak's India Match Boycott: How To Self-Destruct To Make A 'Point'
In the long run, it will be Pakistan who will be wounded the most by this, left bleeding from not one but multiple cuts - hefty fines, potential legal action, and maybe even a ban. All for some chest-thumping.
-
Opinion | US Trade Deal: Is This Trump's 'FOMO' After The India-EU Pact?
The India-EU free trade pact wrong-footed the US, turning on its head the very playbook Trump was using to browbeat America's trading partners.
-
Decoding India's EU, US Trade Deals And A Likely $150 Billion Boost
India announced two mega trade deals - one with the European Union and another with the United States - in the space of a week.
-
Opinion | Budget 2026: Is 'Invisible Kerala' Paying The Price For Being 'Unaligned'?
What Kerala needs is not just sympathy or slogans. We need an alternative that commands respect in Delhi and delivers development in Kerala. Right now, we have neither.
-
21-Year Tax Holiday, Rs 2,000 Crore Safe Harbour: India's Data Centre Bet
Data centres are infamously capital resources-hungry and require massive amounts of electricity (to run the computers), water (to cool servers), and land (on which to build).
-
Blog | "Hamberder" To "Furniture Of Children", Trump And His 'Unpresidented' English
Time and again, Donald Trump has proven that he possesses the best words. They just aren't always the ones in the dictionary.
-
Opinion | Union Budget 2026-27: Don't Look For Fireworks Here. Continuity Is The Goal
The latest Budget needs to be read as a statement of macroeconomic restraint under external stress. Its defining feature is calibration.
-
Opinion | In Trump's World, Wikipedia's Lesson On Collaboration
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales's life's work rests on a proposition that feels almost subversive in 2026: that most people, given the right framework, want to collaborate in good faith.
-
Opinion | Iran Requires a Regime Change, Just Not The Kind America Wants
Trump's dreams of effecting a regime change in Iran need to be considered along two factors related to the power structures within Iran, both of which US seems indifferent to.
-
Opinion | Beyond Ajit Pawar: What Happens To Sharad Pawar's 'Succession' Plan Now?
If Pawar fails to produce one last rabbit from his hat to revive his party after the massive loss of Ajit Pawar, the BJP juggernaut is bound to move in to occupy spaces vacated by the NCP.