Opinion | Gasping In 4 Days? How Iran Humbled US-Israel's Million-Dollar War Inventory
In the ongoing war, in just four days of battle, there are fears that the US and Israel's inventory of Patriot and Tomahawk missiles may run out soon.
Israel claimed Iran to be an 'existential threat', while the US claimed Iran to pose an 'imminent threat' to its mainland through the latter's rapidly growing capability in ballistic missiles. Both launched a pre-emptive air campaign on February 28, targeting key infrastructure in Iran and also taking out its top leadership in a well-timed and executed intelligence operation. Obviously, the killing of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, was the top prize for both the US and Israel. The campaign was expected to pulverise Iran in a matter of days, decapitate its entire political and military leadership and orchestrate a change of regime in Iran in no time.
However, what has been witnessed in the four days has shocked the world and has gone well beyond the wildest calculations of American and Israeli generals. The Iranian counterattack has been focused and ferocious, unmindful of the mighty armies that it is opposing. The death of its Supreme Leader and over 40 top generals has not deterred it but has, on the contrary, strengthened its resolve to fight back. The inadequacy of the American security umbrella in the Gulf region has been exposed as the American defensive systems get overwhelmed and outnumbered. US bases and embassies are being vacated, energy supplies across the Persian Gulf have come to a halt, and there is fear that if the conflict prolongs, the costs that it imposes will soon become untenable for Israel and the US.
Low-Cost For The Win?
Iran is fighting an uneven battle against Israel-US. There is no military matchup when Iran is up against the most modern and lethal militaries in the world. However, military superiority comes at a cost. This war is about fighting with stand-off weapon platforms such as missiles, drones and fighter jets. A comparison in costs is revealing. Some estimates suggest that the US may have incurred a cost of around USD 779 million in the first 24 hours of Operation Epic Fury. The cost estimates suggest an overall expense of around USD 1.24 billion in the first three days. It may not seem too much given that the US military budget is around USD 1 trillion. But the figures give an idea about the cost of a military campaign of this size.
Even so, it is not the overall expense that matters as much as the cost of each weapon platform pitched against what Iran is firing and paying for.
The American Patriot and Tomahawk missiles cost between USD 1-3 million apiece, whereas an average Iranian ballistic missile is priced at merely USD 800,000 to 1 million. Similarly, the MQ-9 Reaper drone costs a staggering USD 30 million compared to the Shahed drone of Iran costing merely USD 30-50K. This huge disparity in costs is resulting in double trouble for Israel and the US. First is the heavy costs, and second is the shorter numbers being produced annually, as a result of which replacement in battlefields, where large numbers are required, becomes problematic.
Will US Run Out Of Inventory?
In the ongoing war, in just four days of battle, there are fears that the inventory of Patriot and Tomahawk missiles may run out soon. The availability of Patriot missiles in the war zone is estimated to be around 600-800 only. Also, for any incoming missile from Iran, four to six interceptors are fired. With an estimate of 150-200 missile interceptors already fired, it is feared that Israel and the US may run out of interceptors in the next four to seven days. There are reports that the US is contemplating shifting some Patriot missiles from Japan and Korea to augment the inventory. Similarly, the Tomahawk missiles, too, may start facing criticality, especially if the battle intensifies in the seas. The production rate of around 600-650 Patriot missiles annually cannot keep pace with the requirements of a war where almost 250-400 missiles are required every week.
Iran knows it and has prepared for it. It has huge missiles and drone inventories, many of them safely kept in underground silos deep inside mountains where American air or missile strikes cannot reach. As per some estimates, Iran's inventory of missiles of various types ranges from 20,000 to 50,000; its drones, too, are in thousands. Knowing the asymmetric advantage it has, Iran is steadily firing a combination of old and new missiles and drones, keeping the Israeli and American defences occupied, knowing fully well that its inventory could last months, if not longer. Plus, it is producing dozens of missiles every month, enough to keep replenishing stocks for months to come. The costs that it is imposing both in terms of expenditure and availability of numbers for critical missiles is becoming a challenge for Israel and the US.
The Human Cost
The cost of body bags is yet another key determinant in the outcome of war. Although President Trump hinted at a number of casualties in the ongoing conflict, the return of body bags in 'away wars' is a big 'No' in America. The early signs of despair are already to be seen as President Trump as well as the Secretary of War counted in their address on March 2 the three lives lost. This was just the third day of war, and they promised to honour their sacrifice with a medal of honour. With many more casualties expected, especially as Iranian missiles are successfully hitting US embassies, bases, ammunition depots and even hotels where evacuated soldiers are staying, this could soon become a cost that President Trump will not be able to bear much longer. Similar is the case with Israel, although it can claim to have a higher threshold, especially as it is fighting an 'existential threat'.
The Political Stakes For Trump And Netanyahu
Both President Trump as well as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have a lot riding on in this war, as far as their political future is concerned. President Trump is fighting steadily lowering approval ratings in the year of mid-term polls. His MAGA base is just about holding on, and the recent Supreme Court judgment against his unilateral tariffs and the scandals triggered by the Epstein files have put him on the back foot. The war with Iran is perhaps an attempt to divert the attention and build on his campaign for the midterm election later this year.
Similarly, Prime Minister Netanyahu faces elections later this year. With the Gaza war still unresolved, his right-wing allies are pushing him to restart a ground offensive in Gaza. The controversial judicial reforms and corruption allegations have put him in the dock, with several court cases against him. In fact, on February 28, the day Israel-US launched pre-emptive strikes, he was due to be present in the courts for a hearing, which was then put off. His actions of firing the Attorney-General as well as the Shin Bet Chief last year have also been met with protests and opposition.
Given this, anything less than an outright victory against Iran could spell doom for the two leaders' respective political careers. Iran knows it and is happy to keep prolonging and expanding the conflict, increasing the time and cost for both Israel and the US.
Reputation At Stake
The Gulf countries had bought their security through American guarantees for decades. Granting permission to locate American bases in the region was part of the security umbrella against any external aggression. After Israel struck Qatar with a missile strike in September 2025, the US had doubled down on giving iron-clad security assurances to the Gulf countries.
The bubble has, however, burst. Almost all Gulf countries have been successfully targeted by Iranian missiles and drones. The American security umbrella has proven ineffective as missiles and drones have destroyed the Fifth Fleet HQ in Bahrain, the largest military base in Doha, other bases in Kuwait, Iraq, the UAE and Jordan, as well as embassies and consulates in Riyadh and Kuwait. Even Oman, the most neutral country and mediator in talks between Iran and the US, has not been spared. Hotels and ports have been successfully struck and there is panic in the region. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has triggered fears of a global economic meltdown owing to stoppage of critical energy supplies.
In the midst of it, the myth of American security lies busted. The reputation built over decades has been shattered. Iran knew about it and the costs it could impose on the US in the future. Its decision to expand the conflict across the region is, therefore, well-calculated, imposing huge economic as well as reputational costs on the US.
Unexpect Outcomes
The conflict is only in its first week, but the tables have turned sooner and faster than expected. Iran, battered by unstoppable air strikes, the assasination of its Supreme Leader and over 40 top leaders, has refused to bow down and surrender. Instead, it has unleashed a strategy that has not only caught Israel, the US and the entire region by surprise but is also imposing costs upon Israel and the US, which may become unbearable soon.
(The author is a retired Army officer and a senior research consultant at Chintan Research Foundation)
Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
-
Opinion | Trump And His America Are Fast Losing Touch With Reality
What is the guiding logic of the rather brash turn in American foreign policy? It is all too easy to box Trump as an irrational player, but frankly, it is a bit of an analytical copout.
-
Game Of Drones: Ukraine's Sting Answer For US' Shahed Problem
The Iranian-designed Shahed-136 drone has become one of the most recognisable weapons of the modern battlefield.
-
Opinion | Iran-Israel War, And What India Can Learn From The 'KC-135' Crash
Transparency doesn't just establish honesty; it denies the adversary the space to peddle the exaggerated claims we frequently see from Pakistan or China, where military losses erode state power.
-
Opinion | Mojtaba's First Message Makes It Clear: Iran Won't Give An Easy 'Exit' To Trump
In Iran, the assassination of a Supreme Leader demands a response, a do-or-die response. Backing down would risk undermining Mojtaba's legitimacy at home and weakening his authority among the hardline institutions that support his regime.
-
Opinion | What Happens If Saudi Arabia Really 'Asks' Pakistan To Go To War?
Since the beginning of the Iran-Israel war, questions have been raised about what role Pakistan would play on the side of the Saudis. The answer is getting murkier.
-
Oil Wars: How Iran's Hormuz Grip Is Bleeding Americans' Wallets
Tehran's response to US-Israel strikes that began Feb 28 was to target oil infrastructure in Gulf nations, an early and clear sign it is trying to force the US to answer questions from the global community about a cost-of-living crisis.
-
Opinion | The Real Winner Of Iran-Israel War Is Someone Trump Never Accounted For
The current crisis promises tens of billions of dollars to Russia in additional revenue. Here's how.
-
Opinion | Iran-Israel War, And The 'War Logic' Behind Bombing Oil Depots
The thinking presumably was that targeting economic interests may, in some sense, galvanise and mobilise the Iranian public against the current administration. But that didn't happen.
-
Opinion | Is Trump Starting To Regret Backing Netanyahu's Iran Gameplan?
Netanyahu may not mind the Iran war, as a prolonged conflict suits him politically. But for the US, it is fast shaping up to be a disaster.
-
Opinion | Amid Growing LPG Crisis, Why Your Piped Gas May Be The Real Winner
While LPG distribution falters amid the Hormuz crisis, PNG supplies to households in major cities continue largely uninterrupted. Will it last?