The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) has formally urged the Civil Aviation Ministry to constitute a 'Court of Inquiry', headed by a retired Supreme Court judge into the June 12 crash of Air India Flight AI 171, alleging that the ongoing probe by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has been compromised.
In a letter dated September 22, 2025, pilots' body said the Aviation probe body's conduct had "fundamentally and irrevocably compromised the integrity, impartiality and legality" of the investigation into the crash of the Boeing 787-8 aircraft (VT-ANB) operating from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick.
The accident killed two senior pilots, 10 cabin crew members, 229 passengers and 19 people on the ground, making it one of the worst aviation disasters in India's history.
Allegations Against Aviation Probe Body
The pilots' body alleged that Aviation probe body officials engaged in "procedural and ethical breaches," including an unsolicited visit to the residence of Capt. Sumeet Sabharwal's 91-year-old father, where they allegedly suggested pilot error using a "selective cockpit voice recorder (CVR) interpretation" and "layered voice analysis."
The pilots' body said this amounted to framing a "pilot error" narrative prematurely, while diverting attention from possible systemic causes such as manufacturing or maintenance lapses. It also accused Aviation probe body of leaking protected CVR details to the media, fuelling "character assassination" of Capt. Sabharwal, a veteran pilot with over 15,600 flying hours.
"This act of 'poisoning the well' serves to frame the victim as the perpetrator from the outset," the letter stated, adding that the leaks violated Rule 17(5) of the Aircraft (Investigation of Accidents and Incidents) Rules, 2017, which prohibits disclosure of cockpit recordings.
Call For Judicial Probe
The pilots' body said only a judicially led Court of Inquiry, with "all the powers of a civil court," can restore credibility. It proposed that the probe be presided over by a retired Supreme Court judge, assisted by independent experts in aircraft maintenance, avionics, human factors, and flight operations.
The pilots' body also drew parallels with the 2010 Mangalore Air India Express crash, which was investigated by a Court of Inquiry headed by a retired Air Marshal, and with the Boeing 737 MAX tragedies, where premature focus on pilot error initially obscured deeper design flaws.
"The current AAIB probe has already failed to meet the minimum standard of independence," the pilots' body said, warning that continuing along this path would damage India's aviation safety credibility and expose the government to international scrutiny.
What Pilots' Body Wants
The federation has demanded for an immediate constitution of a Court of Inquiry under Rule 12 of the Aircraft Investigation Rules, 2017, alongside a judicially led panel with independent technical experts.
The pilots' also call for a formal censure of Aviation probe body, directing it to stop extra-judicial commentary and media leaks, while reaffirming that accident investigations are meant for safety prevention, not apportioning blame.
Families Seek Fairness
In an attached letter, Capt. Sabharwal's father, Pushkar Raj Sabharwal, described how the Aviation probe body's officials confronted him with speculative claims about his son. "At 91 years of age, I seek no favour, only fairness," he wrote, urging that his son's dignity and due process be preserved.
The pilots' body said the demand was not just about protecting one pilot's legacy, but about safeguarding the credibility of India's air accident investigations. "A compromised, biased investigation that defaults to a simplistic and convenient 'pilot error' narrative is the single greatest threat," the pilots' body said.
