actor JIA Chakrabarti has been allowed to travel abroad but with many terms and conditions. She's gotten her passport back, but she has to report to the Indian Embassy every single day. She's been allowed to travel to Abu Dhabi for the IFA Awards, but will have to report daily to the Indian Embassy in Abu Dhabi. Joining us on the broadcast is Vikas Things in advocated? The Supreme Court is also Susan Singh, Rajput family lawyer. Thanks very much, Mr Singh, for being with us. It's JIA Chakrabarti has bureaus. She still got to go through court in order to seek this permission to get her passport and travel abroad. Now she has been allowed to travel. But the questions that are being asked here are why has such tough conditions being imposed on the actor when the actual investigation against her has made no headway? So as far as criminal justice system is concerned in a case against her is not closed as yet. So even if there is a report, the closure report has to be accepted by the child courts or killed. That does not happen. She is very much an accused, and she is very much under investigation was even to allow No closure of charge. Sheet has been child in the matter and people are expecting something to happen. There is soon and the investigation, they say, is still on. So actually the the the kind of Europe she has been permitted to travel itself is our If you ask me a little objectionable because these kind of cases, if there is clued of a criminality being found at some stage and if she absconded, then really speaking there will be no way to bring her back to again. Go to the extradition process and all that, which is very, very difficult to, you know, sort of implement. You know the questions here again. Vikas Sing that having asked Hero, she was accused in this particular case, there was so much hullabaloo made about it. She's of course, been out on bail. She's continued to do her work within the ambit of whatever is permitted as per her bail conditions. But these harsh conditions continue to be imposed on an actor. She's too appeared before the embassy in Abu Dhabi on on every single day that she is there to attend the IFA awards and again I'll go back to the question that everyone's asking that is this really fair, given the fact that this really been no actual proof against our nothing against her has so far been proven in a court of law. So they proof in a court of law will come much later. But if you recall in the Aryan Khan case also when there was no drug, found a name and I have been saying from day and that there was no case may not go that is only based on possession. Still in his bail condition, all these conditions were imposed that used to report at the police station. It's a and he was not allowed to travel abroad. So this is something which is routine in criminal trials. So in the till, you get completely exonerated. And that that would that that is how the system works till you get completely exonerated. And when I mean exhorted, it means that there is a closure report filed and the closure report is accepted by the court. Court decides to exhorted that the accused ended. This may not against us. Till then, you are you are very much and accused. And you, have you been a lawyer? Fall Sachin Singh Rajput family. And this is still a matter that is sub Judas is as you are explaining. So won't be fair to ask you questions that are, you know, pertaining to the case. But you know, you yourself have drawn parallels, say, between an Aryan Khanna area Chakrabarti a euro. And there have been many parallels that have been drawn between these two cases. You know, in the last two weeks when Adam Khan was in fact exonerated of all charges. So you want you make of the fact that again, no proof against her? No headway in the investigation. And yet this is a case that continues to drag on with the assumption of give, not an assumption of innocent. It's like you you're guilty, Tell you a proven innocent. So the example that the comparison I do was very deliberate because in the Aryan can kiss to start with, there was no case made out here. In this case, there is allegation and the allegation is of amendment to suicide and amendment to suicide is not something which can be just brushed off by a prosecution agency. posits up. It's a matter of euro. It's a matter of what the complainant feels is a situation as far as the law here. In this case, the complainant is the father. And there was definitely a stage when the, you know, sort of disconnected the family from sushi I am and try to control his dire ecosystem by the families maintained. And that's 40 of argued in court brought the parallel. So there was a proper allegation here, which is a allegation which will afforded to be go to trial even if that meant for text a call that there is no murder. Where is in that case? There was no question of matter going to trial because there was no position so that if they're no position, no cases made out, it's like I I tell you that you are You are accused of carrying an A gun and you don't have a gun. Crack a case against you go for carrying a gun. So is something like that In the case of Aryan, when he did that on, though, he spent 26 days a child and we're seeing that this is also case it is that is continuing to be dragged with the investigation. With the investigation so far not proving anything, she hasn't been charge sheeted foreign, so investigation has not really reached. Any conclusion is it's an investigation in progress the Storey will continue to track.
