Opinion | We Are Indian. Can We Please Say That In Any Language We Like?
Some people still see English as a marker of privilege. Some see it as a barrier. But when you try to shame people for speaking it, you disregard the aspirations of millions who see English as their best chance to create opportunities.

In the previous column, your columnist shared how greats like Gandhi, Ambedkar, Azad, Savitribai Phule, Vajpayee and others saw the English language as a liberating force. Today, let us continue the conversation, drawing on different voices to emphasise how English remains a vital thread in our national fabric, in spite of what Mr Amit Shah feels.
Maybe Messrs. Modi and Shah might have missed what Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee - whose 125th birth anniversary was a few days ago - had said in the Constituent Assembly: "You have got some time, fifteen years, within which English will have to be replaced. How is it to be replaced? It will have to be replaced progressively. We will have to decide realistically whether for certain special purposes, English should continued to be used in India. As some of my friends have already stated, we might have rid India of British rule-we had reasons for doing so-but that is no reason why you should get rid of the English language. ...After all, it is on account of that language that we have been able to achieve many things. Apart from the role that English has played in unifying India politically, and thus in our attaining political freedom, it opened to us civilisations from large parts of the world. It opened to us knowledge, especially in the realm of science and technology, which it would have been difficult to achieve otherwise."
The 'Mortar Of Unity'
In the 1960s, there were many attempts to impose Hindi as the sole official language. Frank Anthony, a fierce advocate against this view, called English the "mortar of unity". The Member of Parliament and leader of the Anglo-Indian community, fought against attempts to undermine English. Speaking during the 1961 Language Convention in Madras, he stressed that English-medium schools were the only all-India system of secondary education. His efforts, alongside leaders like C Rajagopalachari and K Subba Rao, ensured English's place in post-independent India, preventing what Rajaji called a "Split-India charter".
In 1961, K Subba Rao, who went on to become Chief Justice of India, warned: "To force Hindi down the throats of unwilling people will certainly lead to the disintegration of the country. The best course is to maintain the status quo and to continue with English as the official language". These were pages from history. What about today.
Suresh Gopi, a minister in Narendra Modi's team, reflecting on his teacher Zita Fernandez at Infant Jesus Anglo-Indian High School in Kerala, said: "You enriched us with your talents, culture, and English language skills". His words express the gratitude of millions of Indians - including many in the current Union Cabinet - who benefited from being educated in an English-medium school.
Here is what Dr Neiphiu Rio, Chief Minister of Nagaland and staunch ally of the BJP, said: "In the context of Nagaland, English is the officially declared language of the State. This designation is not recent, it is rooted in our history, where English has played a pivotal role for over a century, particularly in the domains of education, governance, and religion. English serves as vital bridges, linking us beyond our borders to the rest of India and to the wider global community."
The Language We Made Our Own
English is no longer a foreign tongue, it's an Indian language, spoken with our own accents and idioms. As linguist Peggy Mohan observes, it was Dr BR Ambedkar's vision that ensured English remained "equidistant from all communities", preventing linguistic dominance. Knowing English can change the economic and social trajectory of an entire family.
Yes, some people still see English as a marker of privilege. Some see it as a barrier. But when you try to shame people for speaking it, you don't just ignore history, you disregard the aspirations of millions who see English as their best chance to create opportunities, to connect, to be a part of a global language.
So again, India doesn't need less English. It needs more multilingualism. It needs more respect for Tamil, Bengali, Marathi, Hindi, Manipuri, Urdu. And alongside all this, it needs more confidence in speaking English too - without shame, without apology.
We are Indian. And we should be able to say that in any language we choose.
(Research credit: Barry O'Brien's book "The Anglo-Indians: A Portrait of a Community". Additional research: Amit Ghosh and Chahat Mangtani.)
(Derek O'Brien, MP, leads the Trinamool Congress in the Rajya Sabha)
Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
-
Who Rules Under Oceans? US vs Russia Submarine Strength
As Russia and the US return to Cold War-era strategies amid rising tensions over trade and tariffs, here's a look at how they fare under the high seas.
-
Opinion | China, Now Trump: Pakistan And The Art Of Somehow Finding Patrons
Pakistan has successfully lobbied Western capitals into believing in its indispensability in the regional strategic landscape. The US continues to buy this narrative for various reasons, not discounting the naivete among them.
-
From Cow Dung To Cosmos: How India Gave The World Direct-To-Home Television
A collaboration between ISRO and NASA, SITE not only revolutionised rural education but also laid the foundation for what the world now knows as direct-to-home (DTH) TV.
-
Digital Fraud, Cybercriminals Stole Rs 23,000 Crore From Indians In 2024
Bank-related frauds have increased dramatically; the RBI reported a nearly eightfold jump in the first half of FY 2025/26 compared to the same period last year.
-
Opinion | A Rude Awakening For India: Navigating The Trumpian Tempest - By Shashi Tharoor
To simply buckle under US pressure would be a profound miscalculation for India, yielding not just economic ground but strategic dignity.
-
Opinion | Trump Tariffs: Diplomacy Is Dead. Long Live Social Media Theatrics
Trump's playbook is vintage. He first extends his hand as a friend, then strikes with the force of a bully. His tariffs are not about the principle of fairness. They are a blunt instrument wielded for selfish reasons, for dominance and spectacle.
-
Donald Trump Snubs India, Signs Oil Deal With Pak. What Does This Mean?
The US helping Pak is saying to India - 'toe the line or risk your enemy being strengthened upsetting a key ally (i.e., Washington) while you negotiate a trade deal'.
-
The Story Behind Donald Trump's 25% 'Reciprocal Tariff' On India
Mr Trump has reserved special 'praise' for India on tariffs, accusing it of charing unfairly high taxes on American goods imported into its markets.
-
Opinion | Trump Tariffs: The West Botched Up Russia ... And Now Wants India To Foot The Bill
The West has grudgingly recognised its inability to persuade India not to buy Russian oil. However, anti-Russian lobbies continue to apply pressure on New Delhi, seeing that their goal of imposing a strategic defeat on Russia has proved illusory.
-
Opinion | Lunch, Now A State Award: What's With The Growing Pakistan-US Lovefest?
After years of being ignored publicly by recent American administrations, the turnaround in established policy is baffling. What gives?