What are the big changes? You see, post July when? Or post June when you have elections. And then in July, the first budget that the new government will present after us because we're lagging on indicators like FDI inflows, a lot of FP investments also sitting on the sidelines. Do you see these aspects turning tight in the second half of the year from the Indian perspective? Uh, yes, I, I think the man that should turn around, Uh, we we didn't talk about FBI, but, uh, FBI has been tapped in the first six months of the current fiscal year. Uh uh and, uh, uh, part of it, of course, is explained by the fact that uh uh, FBI flows have themselves slowed down because of the rise that happened in the interest rates around then, uh, the the we are talking about the first six months of the current fiscal year. Um, but, uh uh, this needs to turn turn around. And and it's very probable that, uh, E, even though, you know, uh, the the general mood is that the prime Minister is coming back. Uh uh. Investors may still want to see it happen. Uh, And and so, uh uh, perhaps we will see that turnaround. Uh uh uh, election is not very far away. Now, you know, uh, uh, fourth of June, we will all know what the outcome is and that I think should clear up any doubts or uncertainties that are in the investors' minds. Since we are talking about what the next government is expected to do, we are in election season. I have to ask your view about the whole electoral bonds business. The Supreme Court has, of course, now, in short, that it's no longer a function corporate. India is wondering what comes out when? On Thursday we will know those unique numbers. There is a debate on right now whether this will bring back black money, whether it was fair that voters don't know who is donating to whom who is keen to know Your take. Well, I you know, this is, uh, going back to the days when these bonds were introduced, and and, uh, Mr Arun Jaitley was the finance Minister, and I generally found his argument, uh, reasonably persuasive that look, you know, uh uh on what previously existed, Uh, and we are back to that state now, after the bonds have been, uh uh, uh uh Withdrawn. Meaning, you know, further, uh, issuance of the bonds has been withdrawn. Um, you know, Bonds, therefore, to some degree, was an improvement. As far as, uh uh, I can see the, uh, Mr J Le's arguments seem to make sense to me that look, you know, uh uh, absent the bonds, we go back to the cash, uh, and and the bonds were an attempt to solve that problem. That, at least, you know, this would persuade this would encourage the corporations to report what they are donating. So So to that extent, you know, even though that is only half transparent, the bonds would reduce the role of black money. This will all be, you know, any money that comes through the bonds now, you know, can this lead to, uh uh, uh a situation in which we get transparency on both sides, Uh, so that you know who donated to whom and how much? Uh, that will, of course, be ideal. But, uh, I think that, uh, still it looks to me like for the for the time being, it's a bit of a distant possibility
