RV Sanghvi a lost opportunity? Or do think they're still a door open you never seen ever in politics, right? I think this roar open in the I don't think it's necessarily all over the fact that there are two very civilised tweets that they have obviously been written in. Coordinations suggests that there is no ill will look distress, always going to be in negotiations. Sonia Gandhi did not want somebody who didn't understand. According to other Congress, ideology was an outsider. Prashant Kishore is through with being a political doctor. He wanted to be in politics. He knew, I think, is aware of Sonny has used that they would be resistance within the Congress. So it was a question of who needed who more. He made his move now off. The last negotiation didn't work when he thought the Congress was desperate enough to get a men. Originally, I think Sonya's you was always that you're welcome to her comment. But you come in rather that doctor, as you advised the patient on what's wrong, you prescribed medications and when the patient recovers, you leave. That was not Prashant view. Prashant view was that the doctor moved in and took over the household. Obviously there was going to be resistance to that and the negotiation has gone on and I think it floundered ultimately, not because Prashant wanted some kind of organisation responsibility because of the things he wanted to. People keep talking about the old guard and the old guard of posed um, the organ din actuary opposes. The organ has so fed up and sort desperate. They were willing to take anything. The people who really opposed him with the people around Rahul Gandhi. What he wanted was not just for Rahul to have a much more reduced role. And you will not from your debate that the one thing everybody agreed on was that the Congress needs to replace Rahul is it's faced. But the people around Rauer also had to book and I think they resisted and that was where the most resistance came from and that's where the whole thing ultimately collapsed. We're all agreed that the Congress is in trouble. We're all agreed that it needs to do something. We're all agreed. I think also that it had nothing to lose by getting Prashant. It'll just get worse in worst. But in a political party, particularly when you're down and out the people who hung around around you who have been loyal to you, who say we will stick with you no matter what. It becomes difficult to tourism. Vega is you gotta go. You were also discussing before you came on the fact that Rahul Gandhi is not even in the country yet again you and that seems to have been a sore point is well that he is not even part of these important discussions. So he is obviously reluctant on one hand and yet he continues to be there on the other. As I said a right at the beginning. Why do you think that is Iran only? I think that's one of the great mysteries of the Congress. Almost anybody speak tin. You saw the unanimity in your debate agrees that if the Congress goes to next parliamentary elections with Rahul Gandhi as its leader, it will do even worse than it has done before. You can't keep doing the same thing again and again and think that voters will react differently. So when we all see this presumably Rahul keep saying the power as a bad thing and he is not in politics for power, sees this too. So why does he hang out? Why is he not willing to let go if he really cares about the Congress and he likes going abroad? Maybe should take a sabbatical, go for two years, get a PhD or something, leave the Congress to its own devices. It can only prosper. Do you think the party can move beyond the family? Because I thought one of the interesting things that Prashant Kishore had presented to them was Okay. Let's Sonia Gandhi continuous party president but create the post of a working president who's a non Gandhi. Let and this should not be. There is no alternative to that, as he had put it in that presentation. Is that workable? You think that they would ever bite the bullet on something like that? I think so. You know, I think the reason they called him back was because they agreed to that kind of formula whereby Sonia is the top person is the faced and someone like Prashant becomes working president and does everything. But what is that? Everything Prashant essentially is a disrupter. Do have got rid of lots and lots of people. If you do that, there will be a push back and I think that's what happened. I think when we talk about the Gandhi's, we're really talking about different things. There is not that much resistance to Sonia Gandhi being the leader, the resistance, a criticism is all to the siblings, to Priyanka and round. And the fact that Priyanka was pushing for present and the fact that Rahul has been awake suggest that they had also been reconciled, not be high profile of whatever that it is difficult to do in a party like this. When everybody gets his job, not because of performance because of, but because of personal loyalty and they put pressure on you. The only way this can work really is of Rahul removes himself from the scene and unfortunately he is not willing to do that. Therefore last question view Sanghvi. What is that pertained for opposition politics as we head towards the 2020 for general election. If you have a continued weakened Congress, that continues to be on the decline and it is supposed to be the pan India main principle party, what does that mean then, for the challenge to Modi because the are present quite there yet, and it would take time for them to to fill in those gaps. Young at the Emmy figure is very but between 1 52 20 depending who you listened to seats are really between the Congress. In the BJP, the bulk of the BJP seats come the fact that has a strong political based from those areas because it's confident of beating the Congress in the vast majority of those seats. As of now, that's gonna happen again. And Mr Modi is undefeatable. The only hope is if the Congress revised and the events of today suggests that's a long way of.