shut down. For Assad, the word blasphemy is used as if it's going going out of fashion. Anything you say is potentially blasphemous. I baby a Hindu saying something against the Muslim that is blasphemous or vice versa. Online debate is it's It's descended to a level where it's childish now because if you say blasphemy, the implications are huge. It's like blasphemy, and the present context is what the words edition was used in the recent past and other debates. Blasphemy. The world has replaced the dishes. You're right, Vishnu. I agree. In a constitutional position, of course. Our section 2 95 ways. A small exception carved out, which is that if you are effectively saying something, which is of such a serious nature against the gods of a particular religion in a multicultural society that we live in, and if the dozen matter who is the speaker, which religion, then you can be prosecuted. Of course, it's meant for situations which are, or speech, which is of extreme right. It can be of a speech which is critical, genuinely critic, any religion, any God, any practise. There's no problem. So I think that distinction must be made Unfortunately, what has happened is there. In the last many years, we have developed a culture of hit right the government in India has done nothing about. It has either indirectly or directly supported it. They got called out on this particular instance. For whatever reason. Maybe that video went viral by a whole host of government from across the world, and they didn't know what to respond. What the government of end has been doing is they have been playing Gandhi abroad and courts in India effectively. That's what has been happening there. Two phases of those two faces were called out by the governments all over the world. Now, therefore, they didn't know what to do, and it took them 10 days to register for in such extreme case, against against the trap in and immediately under 2 95 that's a clear case of 2 95 a violation. Right now, there can be a whole range of speech which are critical, which are of a religion and not in which religion you can critique Islam. You can critic Hindus, Anglican critic, Christianity. All religious must be pretty. That's a fundamental principle and must be critic vociferously. But the point is, it can be abusive. That's when 2 95 comes it. Now they 10 12 days. And now when they're registering for Zar trying to do fake balance like Mr Condell, visit later. Deli rights Delhi police for me has seized to be a professional police force. They act like completely at the B est of politicians, also considered as a blast. Women's statement. The Delhi police. I don't care about blasphemy against Delhi Police will be commit that in law left.
