Universal Basic Income: Government Report Lists Pros And Cons
Universal basic income is gaining attention in Finland and France It proposes giving every citizen an income to cover their basic needs Several economists advocate cash transfers in India
New Delhi: Providing a cash allowance rather than cheap food or guaranteed jobs would nearly eradicate poverty, but at a cost of 4 to 5 per cent of gross domestic product, a government report said on Tuesday.
Universal basic income (UBI), a radical idea that is gaining attention in countries such as Finland and France, proposes giving every citizen an income to cover their basic needs.
Several economists advocate cash transfers in India, Asia's third-largest economy, where despite rapid economic growth, one in three of the world's extreme poor reside. An emergency medical payment or bad harvest risks a return to poverty for millions more.
The annual Economic Survey, which forms the basis of the annual budget that Finance Minister Arun Jaitley will present tomorrow, said UBI is a persuasive alternative for replacing existing welfare programmes. Yet it warned about implementation risks and the potential cost to government.
"The key merit of it is that it has the potential to improve the weak targeting of current schemes," Arvind Subramanian, the ministry's Chief Economic Adviser, told a news briefing.
Under the survey's calculation, a UBI that cuts the poverty rate to 0.5 per cent of the population would cost 4 to 5 per cent of GDP. The calculation presumes that the richest quarter of Indians do not get the income, because it says any programme cannot in practice strive for strict universality.
Also Read: Notes Ban May Drag Down This Year's GDP Growth To 4-Year Low, Says Economic Survey
At 2011/12 prices, the basic income would amount to Rs 5,400 per person per year. Some economists have questioned whether payments of that size could eliminate poverty.
India currently spends 3 per cent of GDP on subsidies, much of them for the middle class. It pays billions of dollars for some of the world's largest welfare schemes, including cheap food for more than 800 million people and jobs for 50 million households.
"Our main fear is that Universal Basic Income is just being used to replace existing social schemes," said Reetika Khera, an economist at the Indian Institute of Technology in Delhi. "This is a system that is tried and tested and showing signs of improvement."
The Economic Survey cautioned that it was not yet advocating introduction of UBI. A basic income risked becoming too costly, and India would need to improve identification schemes to ensure transfers reached beneficiaries, it said. India's existing programmes contend with corruption and leakages.
Mr Subramanian cited research showing schemes reached more people in the areas where they were least needed, because of the weak capacity of the state in less developed ones. "The advantage of UBI is that we can get around this," he said.
