The settlement means McDougal is no longer bound by the contract with AMI, the parent company of the National Enquirer, which bought - but never published - her story for $150,000 in the months before the 2016 presidential election.
The settlement ends one of two legal battles involving women who say they were paid to stay silent about accounts that would have embarrassed Trump in the final stretch of the campaign. Adult-film star Stormy Daniels is suing to break a confidentiality agreement about her own alleged affair with Trump. Daniels was paid $130,000 by Trump attorney Michael Cohen.
The tabloid company is entitled to 10 per cent of any profit McDougal makes from reselling the rights to her story within the next year, up to a maximum of $75,000, according to a copy of the settlement terms.
In addition, AMI has the right to publish five health and fitness columns under McDougal's byline and to feature her on the cover of Men's Journal. Cameron Stracher, general counsel for AMI, said the company intends for McDougal to appear on the September 2018 issue of the magazine.
Under the terms of the deal, McDougal and AMI must each pay their own attorneys' fees.
Both sides called the deal a victory.
"From our perspective, it's a complete win," Stracher said. "We got out of a lawsuit without paying a dime, she got out of a lawsuit without paying a dime, and everyone's happy and gets to go on their way."
In a statement, McDougal said she was "relieved to be able to tell the truth about my story when asked."
"My goal from the beginning was to restore my rights and not to achieve any financial gain, and this settlement does exactly that," she said.
McDougal alleged in her lawsuit that AMI bought her story in August 2016 not to publish it but to bury it - an outcome she said she welcomed at the time because she did not want her story made public.
But she said her perspective changed after new details emerged about the deal in the news media, particularly communication between the lawyer who negotiated the contract on her behalf, Keith Davidson, and Cohen, who had no formal role in the deal, as well as between AMI - which is led by David Pecker, a friend of Trump's - and Cohen.
Her lawsuit named neither Davidson and Cohen as defendants but alleged they colluded to reach a deal that would bury McDougal's allegations.
AMI had asked the court to dismiss McDougal's complaint, arguing that the deal was protected under the First Amendment.
McDougal's settlement with AMI says that while she releases all claims against the tabloid company, she does not release any claims that she "has or may have" against Cohen and Davidson.
Davidson has said he fulfilled his obligations as an attorney and "zealously advocated" to accomplish McDougal's goals at the time. Cohen's attorney, Brent Blakely, did not immediately return a call seeking comment Wednesday.
AMI and Trump still face complaints the government watchdog group Common Cause filed with the Federal Election Commission and the Justice Department, alleging that the agreement with McDougal amounted to an illegal in-kind campaign contribution to Trump.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Get Breaking news, live coverage, and Latest News from India and around the world on NDTV.com. Catch all the Live TV action on NDTV 24x7 and NDTV India. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram for latest news and live news updates.