Opinion | Why A US Report Mentioning 'Pak Success' Has India Bristling
Just one sentence in a report of a US Congressional Commission has got a lot of knickers in a twist in India. The sentence in the 675-page report reads: "Pakistan's military success over India in its four-day clash showcased Chinese weaponry."
Just one sentence in the annual report of a US Congressional Commission seems to have got a lot of knickers in a twist in India. The sentence in the 675-page report reads: “Pakistan's military success over India in its four-day clash showcased Chinese weaponry.” The US Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC), which is set up by the US Congress comprises specialists on China and has been around for the last 25 years.
It is, therefore, not surprising to see that its take on the India-Pakistan war has been through the filter of China. Its actual focus is the Pakistan-China arms transfer relationship and it cites French intelligence to claim that China launched a disinformation campaign, using AI to show debris of Indian Rafale's allegedly shot down by Chinese-origin weaponry, so as to promote the sales of its J-35 fighters.
In any case, though the Commission conducts hearings, most of the sourcing of the report is from media reports. Given India's poor international media outreach over the 88-hour war, the comment is not surprising since the report is largely based on open media reportage.
The China 'Recommendations'
Of much greater significance than its throwaway comments on the India-Pakistan war are its recommendations relating to how the US needs to confront the China challenge. This task has been amplified by the US-China trade truce signalling China's arrival, even in the minds of people like President Trump, as a component of a G2.
In a recent article in the New York Times, China specialist Rush Doshi pointed out that the US dependence on China is profound and it is only now that the latter is coming to terms with it and taking the first steps to overcome the situation. Doshi noted that the Busan summit of October 30, where the US-China froze their trade war, is the defining moment when Washington accepted that China had become a geopolitical equal of the United States.
More Time, But For Whom?
In his view, this was entirely avoidable, and it was the rash over-reach of Donald Trump by hiking tariffs on China to 140% that led to the Chinese using their brahmastra of rare earths and bringing the US down to earth. As Doshi has written, “It is unwise to invade Russia in winter… [Likewise] It is unwise to start a trade war with the main supplier of your most critical imports until you have mitigated your vulnerabilities.” The trade truce now buys both sides time, but the big worry is that the erratic Trump administration will simply fritter it away.
This is where efforts like those of the USCC come in. As in the past, the 2025 report has focused on China's foreign policy challenge, which has grown to a point, as the section title, “Efforts to Remake the World Order”, suggests. This is followed by a look at how China confronts the West with its manufacturing and innovation engine and the overall Chinese policy of weaponising its economic policies.
Setting Up A "Statecraft Entity"
Perhaps the most important recommendation made by the 2025 report is that of proposing that the US Congress establish “a consolidated economic statecraft entity” to deal with the national security implications of China's systematic and continuing evasion of US export controls and sanctions. While the US has robust laws laying out export controls and sanctions, there is a gap in the enforcement of the laws, which is exploited by China, and, occasionally, Russia. This is the gap that the new body will close.
At present, Chinese companies are able to successfully wriggle through the raft of legislation seeking to restrict the export of technology and knowhow to Beijing. The new entity, reporting to a single Cabinet official, or the US President himself, would have not only the principal US agency dealing with export control - the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce, but also the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the US Treasury, the Bureau of International Security and Non-Proliferation's Office of Export Control and Cooperation, which is part of the Department of State, as well as the Defense Technology Security Administration, which is part of the Department of Defense.
This new body should be integrated into the US intelligence system with enhanced access to real-time intelligence on the evasion networks and real-time intelligence-sharing. The body should also be equipped by powers to aggressively pursue action against violators.
China-Russia, And 'Undersea Sabotage'
Another important angle that emerges from the report is the increasing focus on China-Russia collaboration. The report mentions that Russia is also a country that is able to access US technology by exploiting the loopholes in the American system. The report has called on the Congress to order the US intelligence community to provide an assessment of China's support for Russia's Ukraine war.
In another practical recommendation, the report calls on the Congress to pass legislation to create an Undersea Cable Security Initiative to counter Chinese and Russian sabotage of undersea cables. It wants a ban on Chinese ships laying and maintaining such cables and wants the US to collaborate with friends and allies to develop a multinational fleet of cable repair ships.
Besides calling on the US to help strengthen the Philippines and enhance cooperation with Pacific Island countries, the report has provided the US Congress with classified recommendations to deal with the issue of advanced technology competition. As part of this, it calls on the US to build a resilient biotechnology industrial base, a definite goal in Quantum technology, as well as acquire advanced industrial capacity for rapid manufacturing.
The report has also made recommendations in dealing with China's ambitions to dominate outer space, to break its weaponisation of supply chains by China, and compete effectively to prevent its push for global energy domination. China has long understood that it is the weaker entity as compared to the US, and it has steadily built up its strength and confronted the US only when it was ready.
As of now, the US still does not have a coherent China policy. The Trump administration has exposed the US weakness and the time has come for it to set things right. The US retains its many strengths, but it needs to gather them together. Primary among these are its network of friends and partners, but here again, Washington has dealt with them in a cavalier manner. India is a case in point, where the Trump administration has carelessly hurt a relationship that had been patiently built up through a quarter of a century.
(The writer is a Distinguished Fellow, Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi)
Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
-
Opinion | Mumbai Polls: How The 'Marathi Manoos' Campaign Ended Up Uniting Others Against It
Mumbai's demographic transformation over the past two decades has been dramatic. The city is now home to millions of migrants from across India, who felt directly threatened by the Thackerays' rhetoric.
-
Opinion | The Great Nobel 'Giveaway': Machado About Nothing?
If the goal of politics is to get everything you want while giving up nothing, Trump has had a banner Venezuelan week.
-
Opinion | 'It'll Divide Society': Why Congress Buried The Mandal Report For Years
Indira Gandhi was vetoed four times by her cabinet colleagues from implementing the Mandal Commission report, something that could have been a game-changer for the Congress.
-
Opinion | Pak Blames India For 'Losing' Afghanistan. Numbers Tell A Different Story
As relations between India and Afghanistan continue to be defined economically, it is Pakistan that will be the loser, perhaps an unintended consequence of its own inability to be a good neighbour.
-
Opinion | All Talk, No Take-Off: The Reality Of Pakistan's JF-17 Hype
Pakistan's politically charged statements about its JF-17 jets make little sense given how the source-based discussions and expressions of interest it is boasting of are not cemented in finalised agreements.
-
Opinion | Bitumen: A Crude Item's Curious Link To Trump's Venezuela Strike - And India
What China stands to lose after Trump's Venezuela blitz, India may soon be building at home.
-
Opinion | What Trump May Be Getting Dangerously Wrong About Iran
Trump has reasons to be careful. Iran is not Venezuela. It is nearly as big as Western Europe and remains a military power, despite being degraded by the Israeli and the US military action last year.
-
Blog | Madhav Gadgil: The 'Durable Optimist' Who Believed Science, Too, Has Obligations
Gadgil, despite decades of frustration and bureaucratic sidelining, believed that people could organise, that knowledge could travel, and that democracy, however delayed, could still correct its course.
-
Blog | What's Stopping Vijay's Film? 6 'Conspiracy Theories' About Jana Nayagan
In Tamil Nadu, it turns out you don't need a release date for the promise of a blockbuster. Sometimes, just a missing censor certificate is enough.
-
Opinion | The $700-Billion-Big China Problem Behind Trump's Venezuela Blitz
Venezuela is only part of the story. China has assembled a formidable economic footprint across Latin America. Trade between China and the region crossed $518 billion in 2024, making Beijing the largest trading partner for much of South America.