ADVERTISEMENT
"Last Chance": Top Court Orders RBI To Disclose Bank Inspection Reports
Top court directs RBI to disclose information unless exempted under law It warns central bank to rethink its stand on disclosures under RTI RBI non-disclosure policy in violation of 2015 judgment, says court
26 Apr 2019, 11:14 AM IST 
The top court warned the RBI to rethink its stand on disclosures under the RTI Act
- The Supreme Court had in January this year issued a contempt notice to the RBI for not disclosing the annual inspection report of banks under RTI.
- The petitioners had claimed that the RBI under its former Governor Urjit Patel had "wilfully and deliberately" disobeyed the top court's judgment asking the central bank to disclose information under the RTI Act.
- A bench headed by Justice L Nageswara Rao directed the central bank to review its policy to disclose information relating to banks under RTI, saying "it is duty bound under the law".
- It also warned the RBI to rethink its stand on disclosures under the RTI Act.
- The Supreme Court said the Reserve Bank of India's non-disclosure policy was violation of its judgment in 2015.
- In December 2015, the petitioner under the RTI Act had sought certain information which included copies of inspection reports of ICICI Bank, Axis Bank, HDFC Bank and State Bank of India from April 2011 till date.
- However, the central bank denied the information in January 2016 stating that such information is exempted under the RTI Act and the Reserve Bank of India Act.
- The top court then held that the RBI cannot deny information to an information seeker under the transparency law unless the material is exempted from disclosure under the law.
- The RBI defended its position by stating that it cannot disclose information as the annual inspection report of the bank contained "fiduciary" information.
- In its order on Friday, the top court gave a final chance to the central bank to reconsider its stand on disclosure of annual inspection reports of banks and other details sought by activists. "Any further violation shall be viewed seriously," the Supreme Court said on the matter.
(With agency inputs)