The Delhi High Court today deferred the hearing to January 20 on the pleas of Income Tax department seeking "directions/clarifications" on the December 12 order by which the assets of mobile phone handset maker Nokia in India were defreezed.
The bench headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, which on December 12 had paved the way for sale of Finnish mobile firm to Microsoft subject to certain conditions, raised certain technical and procedural infirmities in taking up the plea of I-T department.
"As the roster has changed, you (I-T department) need to get one of the applications referred to us by a judicial order of the bench which is presently dealing with tax matters," Justice Khanna said.
Now, the I-T department on Monday would move to a bench headed by Justice S Ravindra Bhat for an order to transfer the plea to the original court.
The court, on December 12, had ordered defreezing of assets of Nokia in India with certain condition including that Nokia India will deposit a minimum of Rs 2,250 crore in an escrow account while its parent company Nokia Corporation (Corp) would be liable to pay the tax dues as applicable under the Income Tax Act upto maximum of Rs 3,500 crore.
Seeking modifications in the order, the I-T department, in its fresh application had said "in the conditions imposed by the High Court ..., the situs of amount of Rs 3,500 crores and the realisation thereof is not stated/directed.
The court had on December 12 allowed the plea of Nokia for lifting of a stay on transfer of its assets in India. The firm had said that the injunction will jeopardize the sale of its Indian arm to Microsoft under a $7.2 billion global deal.
The I-T department, which had rejected the offer of Nokia to pay a minimum deposit of Rs 2,250 crore to it, said Nokia India and Nokia Corporation owe it Rs 21,153 crore as total tax liability (existing and anticipated), including penalty during a seven-year period from 2006-2013.
The I-T department has also sought certain directions "pertaining to the mechanism for adjustment of refunds till the tax issues reach finality."
"Petitioners have yet to furnish the undertaking and guarantee bond in terms of the Court's directions dated 12.12.2013 and the Appellant/Respondents (IT department) reserve their right and seek liberty to give their comments /response/objections, if any, as and when the guarantee bond/undertaking is made available by the Petitioners (Nokia)," it said.
On December 12, the court had defreezed the assets of the Finnish firm in India, specially the Chennai manufacturing plant.