- Board should consider Nandan Nilekani at the helm, says V Balakrishnan
- His experience makes him good face to lead the firm, adds ex-Infy CFO
- Vishal Sikka resigned as Infosys CEO last week citing slander by founders
"Nilekani is a good face to have... I personally think if at all he comes back, he should come in as the chairman and try to identify a good CEO. That will be ideal situation," he said.
Mr Balakrishnan argued that Mr Nilekani had "done well" during his tenure at Infosys and had been well connected with customers.
"Nilekani is a good global face and is most respected. Moreover, he has worked in large government projects... Aadhaar... he has the right credentials to come to the board," Mr Balakrishnan said, but hastened to add that Mr Nilekani's return is a "speculation" at this point.
In a sudden move, Infosys' first non-founder CEO, Vishal Sikka, resigned last week citing slander by founders. The Infosys board issued a stinging statement blaming co-founder N R Narayana Murthy for the CEO's resignation. Infosys has said it will find a CEO replacement latest by March 31, 2018.
On August 18, the day Mr Sikka announced his resignation, investor advisory firm Institutional Investor Advisory Services (IiAS) said it favoured Nilekani being brought back on the board as its non-executive chairman.
IiAS said the Infosys board has been "unable to protect its CEO" and to select a successor, it must begin by "reinventing itself".
"It must convince Nandan Nilekani to join the board once again as its non-executive chairperson," it had said in a report, adding that Mr Nilekani should not see this as any other corporate job as Infosys is at the heart of Indian IT and its success will foretell how the sector will position itself for future.
In fact, the war of words between the Infosys board and Mr Murthy has been on for months now. Mr Murthy, along with some former key executives, has alleged serious lapses in corporate governance and raised questions on executive pay as well as a $200-million acquisition.
Matters came to a head when an anonymous letter was sent to the market regulator earlier this year alleging that Israel-based Panaya's acquisition by Infosys was overvalued and that some company executives may have benefited from the deal.
While an independent probe absolved the board of any wrongdoing, Mr Murthy kept up the pressure on Infosys exhorting the company to make the full contents of the investigation report public.
Following Mr Sikka's resignation, the board launched a scathing verbal attack on Mr Murthy blaming his "continuous assault" and demands as the reason behind Mr Sikka's extreme move.
It also ruled out a formal role for the co-founder in the company's governance.