» Story
 
  SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Vande Mataram: 'No resolution passed before me'
NDTV Correspondent, Wednesday November 4, 2009, New Delhi

(File photo)
A day after the BJP questioned his presence at the Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind conference in Deoband, where a fatwaa was issued against Vande Mataram, Home Minister P Chidambaram has hit back.

Chidambaram says he was not present when the Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind adopted a resolution at its 30th general session in Deoband on Tuesday asking Muslims not to recite 'Vande Mataram'.

"Home Minister P Chidambaram was at the JUH conference at Deoband on November 3 between 10 am and 12 noon. No resolution was passed during that period. When he spoke, he was not aware of any resolution relating to Vande Mataram or women's reservation and television," a statement issued by his aide said.

Besides, the Home Minister was reading from a prepared text and there was no occasion to depart from that text, the statement said reacting to a statement of BJP leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi.

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind had on Tuesday endorsed a fatwaa issued by the influential Darul Uloom seminary at Deoband that calls on Muslims not to sing Vande Mataram as doing so was violative of Islam's faith in monotheism.

The resolution was passed on a day when the home minister addressed the assembly at Deoband.

The BJP lost no time in reacting - claiming that the minister's presence had "legitimised" the "anti-Vande Mataram" view.

The Jamiat move has come in the backdrop of some states like BJP-ruled Madhya Pradesh introducing singing of Vande Mataram in government-run schools.

BJP vice-president Mukhtar Naqvi said singing Vande Mataram was not compulsory but the manner in which the Jamiat opposed the verses immortalised in Bankim Chandra Chatterjee's classic was unacceptable. He also targeted Chidambaram for addressing a gathering where the singing of Vande Mataram was opposed saying this would be read as support for the Jamiat's "retrograde" viewpoint.
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend     
Comments: Read | Post
Comments
Posted by Musthafa on Nov 05, 2009
I think this issue has been exaggerated a lot more. We Indians are a diverse community with different languages culture and different beliefs. Above all we are Indians and there comes the importance of "Unity in diversity". Any common Muslim, who believes in Islam, may find issue in some of the words used in Vande Mathram. On other hand the same belief teach every Muslims to love their home land. "Loving your motherland is an integral part of your faith" this is the teaching of Islam to its followers. I might say Islam is the only religion which told (in its books) its followers to love our mother land. So its impossible for an Indian Muslim to become a traitor in his country. It's disrespectful to set standards for showing patriotism. I respect this song, because this song motivated a lot of Indians to join independence movement. Finally as an Indian Muslim, I love my country, my mother & my father. But I can only worship GOD.
Posted by Virender on Nov 04, 2009
I believe Nation comes first than the religion. I am not sure why these so called padrees, muftis and pundits want to dominate what we should do and what we should not. The religion who tell us not to pray or worship or salute the motherland is not a faith to worship. We should not obey any religion who tells us not to salute or pray for our motherland. The religion is secondary like clothes and one can change religioin if he belives so but same is not true in case of praying for motherland. Dear (from all religion) there is no harm in respecting the National Anthem, National Song and the thing associated with Nation. It invokes sense of pride and unite all of us.
Advertisement
Advertisement
On Facebook