» Story
 
  SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Sharad Yadav threatens suicide over women's quota
NDTV Correspondent, Friday June 5, 2009, New Delhi

PTI image

A day after President Pratibha Patil revealed the UPA government's plan to pass the women's reservation bill within 100 days, strong objection comes from Sharad Yadav, a long standing critic of the bill.

Speaking in parliament on Friday, the JD (U) leader and NDA convener said he would die before allowing any such bill without a quota for Dalit women.

"I will consume poison and die but I won't allow the women's reservation bill without a quota for Dalit/Tribal women," he said.

Earlier, President Pratibha Patil announced that the "government will ensure that women's reservation bill is passed in 100 days."

The Women's Reservation Bill was first introduced in September 1996 and since then it's been reintroduced 3 more times. Staunch opposition from players like Mulayam Singh Yadav, Lalu Yadav and Sharad Yadav has always come in the way of its passage.

Even on Thursday, they stuck to their earlier stand of asking for quota within quota.

Says Samajwadi Party leader Mulayam Singh Yadav: "We will discuss with our colleagues within our party."

Sharad Yadav, president of Janata Dal United, wanted "quota within quota...just the way we have done it in Bihar."

The Women's Reservation Bill is a Constitutional amendment bill and needs a 2/3rd majority in both the Houses to get it passed.

In Lok Sabha, where the government has a clear majority, it needs the support of 364 MPs.

In Rajya Sabha, the UPA needs the support of 153 MPs. But the UPA is short of a majority in the Upper House.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend     
Comments: Read | Post
Tags: Sharad Yadav, Women's reservation bill, Women's Reservation Bill
Comments
Posted by Utpal Kumar on Jun 21, 2009
There has been hue and cry about women reservation bill and some modifications in it for a long time now but i think that such a law itself should not exist. A person (in this case a Man) who has worked for his constituency throughout life will suddenly find that he is not allowed to contest election from that constituency because it is reserved for women. This is really ridiculous in democracy and is definitely biased against men. Shortcuts are not always good. If women want to come to parliament then they should fight in a democratic way with men. This will give them more respect. NCW and other women organizations are misusing the enormous power being bestowed to them and even the media now are acting irresponsibly. When the OBC quota was introduced the media was responsible enough to show both sides of it. But now even they are biased and are blaming politicians in delaying the passage of the bill. This is a sad situation wherein talent and people's will are given a second seat. The advocacy of such a law shows immaturity and lack of responsibility on the part of its supporters. I hope such a law is not passed so that any capable PERSON can contest election from the constituency of his/her choice.
Posted by Ms. M on Jun 10, 2009
I wonder why is this reservation required....when a women thinks that she has the capability and she can win her people's trust .. let her come up on her own..why do they require reservation...
Advertisement
Advertisement
On Facebook