» Story
 
  SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Ruchika case leads to new rules for FIRs
NDTV Correspondent, Monday December 28, 2009, New Delhi
Nine years passed before a police case was filed against SPS Rathore for molesting a teenager who went on to kill herself.  

Rathore, a senior police officer in Haryana was indicted by his boss who investigated the complaint filed against him by 14-year-old Ruchika Girhotra. But the government's sanction - required because Rathore was an Inspector General - was impossible to win.

Rathore, in fact, was promoted to the top-most post, Director General of the Haryana Police.

Now, as public outrage builds against a man who so clearly enjoyed and exercised political clout, the government says it wants to change the rules. (Read: How you can help fight for justice for Ruchika)

For one, states have been told that all written complaints must be treated as First Information Reports (FIRs) because this makes them easier to action. To ensure transparency, policemen will also have to justify every arrest that follows as a result of an FIR, or explain why someone named in an FIR was not arrested.

Another fallout of the Ruchika case: Any officer who is convicted of a crime, will automatically have to forfeit medals. S P S Rathore was awarded a medal for meritorious service in 1985.

That ruling means another senior police officer from Haryana, RK Sharma, will have to return the medal he received in 1996. Sharma has been convicted for the murder of a journalist. Also likely to be impacted: A senior official of the Narcotics Bureau under trial for allegedly involvement in a drug racket; and a Jammu and Kashmir senior officer who led many anti-terror operations but is now being tried for destroying evidence.  

According to sources in the Home Ministry, the Medals Committee will discuss these cases on January 4.

Many argue that the real punishment lies in revoking the perques and pension of convicted officers.
 
 
More »
 
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend     
Comments: Read | Post
Tags: circular, complaint, Rathore, Ruchika
Comments
Posted by Harika Kulkarni on Dec 31, 2009
Death penalty is not the punishment for everything. Hanging someone is just a few moments of pain, but making someone live in arduous pain & direb isolation from near and dear ones for the rest of their life, is the real punishment one can face. Every person before even thinking of commiting a crime should go through a thought process of the punishment. Ruchika just relieved herself of the intense pressure but dont let the person who led her to this go so easily. Just death - 'A big "NO NO"' Rigorous imprisonment for the rest of his life.
Posted by Bumble Bee on Dec 29, 2009
I agree with new rules. While discretion is 'advisable', it is proven time and again that wisdom of policemen not to register an FIR works mostly against poor, marginalised and less-affluent or less connected ordinary people. Instead of looking at the problem as a mountain of paperwork, schemes to electronically register a FIR should be initiated. Also the punishment for registration of a false FIR should be stringent and cautionary. Punishment of policemen who refuses to register FIR should also be mandatory and for dereliction of duty. To reduce investigative resource burden, preliminary investigative powers should rest with ordinary constable rather than inspectors. Rather than fearing breakdown of police machinery due to overload and not register cases, it will be prudent to work backwards and regulate the investigative environment. Otherwise it would be akin to playing judge before trial completes a.k.a putting cart before horse
Advertisement
Advertisement
On Facebook