»  Grassroots Glimpses  »   Post
In the name of development
Wednesday April 22, 2009

For years, tribals agitated to get a state that they can call their home. Now they live in the fear of being uprooted from their home, in the name of development.

Manu Pingua, who has taken voluntary retirement from the Jharkhand government services just a couple of years ago, is spending his days in constant fear these days. His village falls in the area that has been earmarked by the state government for an ambitious steel plant, to be set up by JSW Steel. Pingua is apprehensive, that one fine day, he might just receive a sealed envelope from the state revenue department, asking him to vacate his land to facilitate the "prestigious" steel plant.

This isn't Pingua's fear alone. Many tribals in and around Ranchi, who have inhabited this region from time immemorial, have this constant fear to cope with. It is surely the most burning political issue. But what makes it more glooomy for the tribals here is that they think they have nowhere to go. "Neither the UPA nor the previous NDA government has done enough to allay the fears of dislocation," says a disillusioned Pingua.

The day Arcelor Mittal signed up an MoU with the Jharkhand government in 2006, there were screaming headlines all over. Politicians belonging to the ruling NDA went to town with claims that the project will wipe out poverty from the state forever. Possibly, it could have. The project could have provided direct employment to about 10,000 educated youth in the area. Then why the resistance? What went wrong? "Perhaps the selection of land," says Dayamini Barla, tribal rights activist. "The state has thousands of acres of barren land that cannot be cultivated. The government should have cautiously earmarked only unfertile barren land for such projects. If you try to take away three crop land, which is situated at a stone's throw from the state capital, it is bound to attract resistance."

Barla is spearheading a mass movement of tribals in and around Torpa in Jharkhand, against the Arcelor Mittal proposed facility.

After having lauched a peaceful agitation for several decades to press their demand for a separate state, the local population is again having to go back to the old ways. Their main grouse, demand a separate state, had been against the domination of the locals by outsiders, or 'dikus'. Now, their own elected government is threatening to uproot them in the name of development.

The local population believes that the state government is discriminating against them. There are some apparent flaws in the state government's resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) policy as well, which is why, the government policy has not been able to muster support at the grassroots.

The R&R policy permits only one member from each family selling land for a particular project to get employment in the project. The government can attract substantial support by a minor tweak in this policy. All it needs to do is make provisions for employment of more than one member, where family size is large.

Both the mainstream political parties know that this is an issue they can't afford to take lightly. Says Ram Tahal Chaudhary, BJP candidate from Ranchi, "We will ask companies to do smaller projects. When companies come with such big projects, it leads to many people getting uprooted. This is a very painful process as far as tribals are concerned, and addressing this is prime on my agenda."

According to Subodh Kant Sahay, Congress candidate and union minister in the outgoing UPA government, "The state government should have simply adopted the national rehabilitation policy. With this, a lot of issues could have been addressed. This is a very serious matter. Political parties across the board need to come together and work a way out, so that development can take place without uprooting tribals."

 
   SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Comments: Read | Post
Comments Post your comments
 
Posted by Dr.M.C.Gupta on Nov 08, 2009
Adhibasis were exploited by middle men in the past & now Maoists are exploiting them for their benefit primarily. poor adhibasis who were living by the produce from the forest are now at a big disadvatage as the products they try to sell donot fetch them sufficient money. at the same time their families have grown too big which they are unable to look after. It will be advantage for them to sell their land at a good price & take up jobs in the factories which are likely to come up in their land. Maoists are of no help for a proper family life. Dr. Gupta
 
Posted by hanumesh on Sep 03, 2009
I think this should be treated as not a story but a social initiative and joined by all who love to call themselves true Indians.
 
 
Posted by dinabandhu on Jun 09, 2009
Development always leads to change in circumstances, which should be tolerated. The only hiccup here is that such changes need to be managed by an authority who specialises in over seeing and rehabilitating people with a guarantee. The problem is we do not have a national rehabilitation agency who is skilled enough to resettle people by identifying their needs better and also making it faster.
 
Posted by Arun on May 26, 2009
In the name of globilzation you can not allocate fertile land just like that, i have seen fate of many such proposels which are still at the same state, govt should also take the accountability of relocation & rehabilitation of inhabitants,good to encourage industrilization which boosts indian economy not by deserting commom man.
 
Posted by Rakhi on Apr 28, 2009
When a steel plant or any such big projects are undertaken you are bound to have tons of problems. The officials should take necessary measures to promote these companies while keeping in mind the wellbeing of its citizens. Is it really true that all it takes is a sealed envelope asking people to vacate? I shudder at the thought. Shouldn't they also be providing the alternate homes etc to support them while they relocate (uprooted sounds a bit too strong)? Steel plant would require so many millions of dollars, surely a little percentage of it can be allocated for peoples relocation? While the Union minister correctly says that it's a serious problem, I wonder if it's being treated that way.
 
Posted by Shahnawaz on Apr 24, 2009
Totally agree...If the government is signing a MoU with Mittal it shold have allocated barren lands and not the rich cutivable land.....
 
Posted by Sid on Apr 24, 2009
A kaleidoscopic view of the series of interconnected events taking place in the state of Jharkhanda which for sure is taking away the joy of having got their own land from the citizens of the state. This is how i would describe this article from Mayur. I think this should be treated as not a story but a social initiative and joined by all who love to call themselves true Indians. Keep it up Mayur! Look forward to more such eye-openers..
 
 
Post Your Comments Fields marked with * are mandatory
*Name:
E-mail:
*Comments:
  Limit 4000 characters - 4000 characters remaining
*Secure Code:
  Problem viewing this image. Click to refresh
 
 
Kindly do not post any defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful material or information. NDTV Convergence Ltd reserves the right to remove without notice any content received from users.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
On Facebook
About Me
Mayur works in the NDTV Profit, Delhi Bureau. In the past, he has written extensively on land acquisition issues, first for Economic Times, and then for the Financial Chronicle.
Latest Posts
The Untouchables: Bombay Police after 26/11
There is a story the officers of Bombay police like to tell: of brotherhood, risk and the fight against evil.
Ever-reddy
For the Reddys to be hailed as only the kings of Bellary, was galling. Their sights were set over controlling north Karnataka.
Tawang, in preparation
Tawang is in bridal makeup. Dressed for the occasion to receive their Spiritual Guru. It's a pretty picture of festivity.