| |
Newsletter 
  RSS
NDTV.com
Updated: December 27, 2009 22:49 IST
   What's New:   Classifieds   |   Auto   |   Jobs   |   Tutoring US only NDTV GURUJI NDTV Search
NDTV Print Story Story Video Story Images Story Comments Message Board
Rate the Story
NDTV Active
To read the biggest stories of the day on your mobile, type mobile.ndtv.com on your phone browser.
Most Watched Videos
NDTV
SRK, Aamir together for 3 Idiots premiere
NDTV
Vijay Vashisht reviews 3 Idiots
NDTV
Bollywood gives thumbs up to 3 Idiots
NDTV
Review: 3 Idiots
NDTV
Saif Obsessed with Bebo
Poll Center
Ram Setu: Can politics be divorced from religion?
Yes
No
Can't say
Forums
Should Sethu project be shelved in view of security threat?
User Name Password
New User ? Sign In
An inquiry by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has found two of its officials prima facie guilty of not carrying out government instructions in the filing of the controversial affidavit on the Setu Samudram issue in the Supreme Court.

A report of the internal inquiry into the issue conducted by ASI Director General Anshu Vaish was recently submitted to the Secretary, Culture, a senior official of the Culture Ministry said.

He said a formal departmental inquiry will now be carried out, which will cover the entire case and not just the role of the two officials - Director (Administration) Chandrasekhar and Assistant Director (Monuments) V Bakshi - who were earlier suspended following a preliminary probe by the ASI DG.

A chargesheet will be issued to the two officials and they will be asked to submit their explanation in the matter, the official said.

The suspension of the two ASI officials, meanwhile, was revoked yesterday and they were asked to resume duties with immediate effect.

"The ASI officials have been reinstated as it is a procedural requirement. You cannot keep someone suspended for more than three months," the official said.

The two ASI officers were put under suspension on the orders of Culture Minister Ambika Soni on September 14, shortly after the controversy over the affidavit broke out.

The ASI DG was asked to submit a report on the matter, including an explanation on her own role in the fiasco.

Later, Vaish was asked to conduct an inquiry into the issue and submit her report to the Secretary, Culture.

Vaish submitted her report to the Secretary, Culture last week, based on which a decision was taken that a formal departmental inquiry will now be launched into the matter.

The ASI affidavit submitted in the court, which was later withdrawn, had triggered a major political storm by stating that there was no historical or scientific evidence to prove the existence of Lord Ram.
Print Story Story Video Story Images Story Comments Message Board
Story Finder 
Save & Share Yahoo Digg Reditt Del Newsvine
 
User Comments [ +Comment on the story ]
NDTV Posted By Paranthap-Friday, December 14, 2007
All eye wash. Some officials are being made scape goats. As someone has already commented why the govt. took one week to file the revised affidavit. Actually in the land of Hindu majorit Hindu faith is treated badly.
 
NDTV Posted By Srikanth-Thursday, December 13, 2007
If the govt is so serious, why it took 1 week to file an another affidavit. It shows the appeasement mentality.
 


About Us | Advertise | Feedback | Disclaimer | Investor | Careers | Transmission | Distribution | Complaint Redressal
© Copyright NDTV Convergence Limited 2009. All rights reserved.